Did you get the flyer?

Chichester District Council
Planning Dept
East Pallant House
Chichester
West Sussex
PO19 1TY



I'll try to get the results of the survey in print in to Cee Gees for people to pick up soon. It's only right that people who filled it in get to hear about the results - which were very good. You can also find the results on this blog.

The flyer which came round didn't have the Chichester DC postal address so it's here at the top of this blog. Please IF YOU'RE READING THIS AND YOU CARE ABOUT THE REC, WRITE NOW. YOUR OBJECTION DOESN'T NEED TO BE CLEVER OR INFORMED OR KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT PLANNING MATTERS, IT JUST NEEDS TO OBJECT TO THIS ILL-INFORMED IDEA. The end-date for objections to the idea of building on the rec during the informal phase is 2nd March, so not much time left.

By the way, I know that a number of people have posted comments on this blog, but I've no idea how many people have read it or done anything as a result. If you know anyone who's been here and used it, it would be good to know. I suspect from the reaction at the Parish Council meeting that a lot more people have been to this blog than I know. It would be great to know how many people have got on and protested by email or post too.

Onwards and upwards. If you want to moan, and I for one think that moaning is a really effective way of registerng a protest go to http://www.chichester.gov.uk/and moan at them. Interestingly, there's no easy way to find out district councillor's Chichester DC email addresses - Tex where are you? In fact I think it's very interesting that our elected representatives seem to be keeping a low profile. Do we wonder if they might be happy to see development in Camelsdale (possibly 170 houses BUT fewer in Fernhust and none in Lynchmere or Hammer)? I only ask in the absence of information to the contrary. I exempt Heather from this as she's been commendably cross about the proposals. Well done Heather, but you seem to be a voice in the wilderness?